Adam Wise, an expert on all sorts of spectroscopy, optics, and metrology started defining spectroscopy according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists as “The study of physical systems by the electromagnetic radiation with which they interact or that they produce”. However, this definition can lead to several questions regarding the nature of the physical systems mentioned, the kind of electronic radiation, the kind of interaction, and how this is measured. Considering the vagueness of the words used in the definition, electromagnetic radiation can be from x-rays to gamma rays and visible light, the physical system can be a living creature, a gas, or even a solution. Finally, regarding the interaction, this can include absorption, scattering, re-emission, and so on. If all these variables are possible, does that mean that simply observing differences in tomatoes’ colors can be considered spectroscopy? Unfortunately, no.
One key distinction Wise highlighted is the absence of quantitative elements in casual observations. Unlike scientific spectroscopy, where precise measurements and numerical data play a crucial role, casual observations lack the rigor and precision required for scientific inquiry. Therefore, even when the human eye is a powerful instrument, it falls short in providing quantitative information, limiting its ability to discern specific colors outside broad categories and wavelengths which is directly linked to wavelength resolution.
Continuing with the analysis of the given definition, it is critical to define electromagnetic radiation which extends beyond visible light, encompassing a broad spectrum of waves, a fact that was confirmed in the mid-19th century, even when the nature of waves was realized earlier in the 17th century. Therefore, the revelation that colors, such as red, green, and blue, are manifestations of the same wave with varying spatial distances between crests (wavelengths) was particularly surprising. This notion prompts contemplation on the nature of color perception and the underlying connection between the seemingly diverse palette of hues, leading to the conclusion that color is a construct of human perception. Even when we can assign numerical values to wavelengths and intensities, our brains interpret these values as distinct colors, suggesting that color is a phenomenon intricately tied to our subjective experience.
Now that wavelengths have been established as a critical concept for spectrometry, it is relevant to acknowledge their connection to energy, starting with how the visible spectrum is not only relevant to human perception of color but also as a form to illustrate the energy ranges among the spectrum. These energy ranges are the consequence of the molecular vibrations and electronic transitions in atoms and molecules occurring. Here, another relevant definition is introduced, linking wavelength and frequency. This relationship is expressed through a fundamental equation involving the speed of light, which remains constant in a particular medium, Therefore, as the wavelength (meters per cycle) increases, the frequency (cycles per second) decreases, and vice versa.